time strikes. I will start saying I'm totally supportive of the drivers. We want to save the public? We seek the road sag rates, but to reduce the value of waste paper license (very expensive, in Milan we are well over 100,000 euros) for the conduct of public car has the stench of ill-concealed proletarian expropriation. Then I met taxi drivers rarely billionaires, glad that they won their battle ... step further, and here go along, because it is my field: pharmacies. Pharmacists (owners) earn too much? Maybe so. E 'category too anachronistically still protected? Probably. Privileged? Now do not exaggerate. Clarify my position: I do pharmacist. My wife is a pharmacist, my father is a pharmacist, my work is purely bureaucratic issues related to the (terrible) and commercial, first I have a low opinion of most pharmacists, both in terms of university preparation almost inenistente in relation to what is required the real work (a factor that has contributed very significantly to discredit the professional look, so that some prefer the advice of the concierge to that of a degree in pharmacy), both in terms of sense of belonging to a category.
Drugs di automedicazione al supermercato (a proposito, per l'Aulin è necessaria la ricetta, anche se lo si vende come acqua fresca, quindi non sperate di trovarlo alla Coop, come ventilato da qualche giornalista imbecille)? Per me va bene, è cosa comune in moltissimi altri Paesi. Ma non venitemi a raccontare la soave idiozia che ciò sia fatto per far risparmiare il cittadino, perchè si tratta dell'ennesima presa per i fondelli sparata da qualche abile quanto ignobile politico. Facciamo un po' di esempi? Quante confezioni di Aspirina comprate in un anno? tre o quattro? Aspirina compresse 500mg costa 3,95 Euro, con la possibilità di trovarla comunque scontata fino al 20% in conseguenza del decreto-Storace (possibilità di scontare fino al 20% in farmacia i prezzi dei farmaci non sottoposti a prescrizione medica). Comprando 4 confezioni, NON scontate, spendereste 15,80. Diciamo che i supermercati potrebbero vendere la medesima Aspirina al 30% di sconto, spesa 11,04, però, ben 4,80 Euro risparmiati in un anno. A proposito, dell'Aspirina come di moltissimi altri prodotti esiste il generico, cioè medicinale unbranded , non griffato, assolutamente identico per principio attivo e forma farmaceutica ma di prezzo inferiore fino anche al 50%, ma normalmente voi non lo acquistate, perchè "magari non è uguale e mi fa male", "prima sento il medico", "per carità, la portinaia/estetista/parrucchiera mi ha detto di prendere ONLY this ".
Another example. Drugs against osteoporosis based on alendronate. One tablet a week for life. Granted free National Health Service (the mutual, long story short), in principle, just in case of fractures due to osteoporosis occurred rarely as a preventative thereof. Price 38.70 Euro per month. Multiplied by 12 months, 464.40. Obviously nothing supermarket (prescription required) and no sharp declines for drugs for the treatment of real utlità of chronic diseases. We said, about 460 Euro for one year of alendronate: expensive if paid by the State, even worse if borne by the pensioner with the least. Many cases like this. Have you ever wondered why a huge number of drugs passed by the NHS has very high price? Lobbying by the pharmaceutical industry tells you anything? It has more power to fine and bad weather the global giant XYZ or the pharmacy of Dr. Rossi? We want to then talk to practitioners and comparaggio, and for now I will not dwell, but there would have to say ... Lower drug prices, those "real" and expensive, not aspirin, this is the solution, both for the savings of citizens who do not reduce the already poor state coffers. Industry will earn less, earn less than the pharmacy, it very gudagnarebbe community. Really
then you want to animate the competition? Other medications that to the supermarket just to further the interests of large business groups (Coop for the first ...), we should review the staffing plan of pharmacies, which limits the presence of a limited number of the same territory, and you'll see how it comes alive competition ... Pharmacists who finally put them to invest in the quality of the store, which will begin to understand how the word "market" does not represent a world to deal with liabilities that will bring the focus of a professional re-evaluated. " I'm more good at everything and I have more customers my competitor," more than to live on the laurels of a sputtanatissima protected category.
close my speech by quoting from a statement by one of the representatives of various associations di consumatori, nel caso specifico il Codacons, ma a parer mio un po' tutte queste sigle raffigurano un'ideologia di base colma di frustrazione e malafede... In pratica rappresentano la chiara dimostrazione di cosa voglia dire essere prevenuti, pensando che in quanto "consumatori" tutti i commercianti e professionisti di qualsivoglia categoria (che sono anch'essi consumatori, che diamine...) vogliano cercare di "consumare" loro lo sfintere a furia di piantarglielo nel c... I truffatori ci sono ovunque, e sono sempre di più, ma partire dal presupposto che tutti siano truffatori fino a prova contraria mi pare l'assurdo motto delle associazioni di consumatori.
tratto da Farmacia.it:
" Non solo le farmacie non hanno discounts applied in favor of citizens under the Decree Storace (???, ed) - supports President Carlo Rienzi Codacons - but now they also want to strike against the measure, that the sale of drugs in supermarkets, leading to a up to 30% reduction in drug prices. If he is confirmed the strike on Wednesday, denouncing the pharmacies involved for interruption of public service and ask the individual regions to assess the withdrawal of licenses of pharmacists against the rebels, in relation to the failure of the service. "
Bravo, she who understood it all ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment